Evidence & academic case rooms

QUESTION.
CONNECT.
LEARN.

Structured, cross-disciplinary discussion for the questions that cannot be solved by one profession or one paper.

Source first

Every room begins with primary research, a consensus statement or an official clinical framework.

Privacy first

No names, images, dates, clubs or combinations of detail that could identify an athlete or patient.

Multi-disciplinary

Athletes, clinicians, coaches, lawyers, researchers and organisers can see different parts of the same case.

Case questions

Six questions worth discussing well.

Use these educational prompts to compare evidence and professional perspectives. They are not real patient records.

Consensus case 02

Performance drops while training load remains stable

Which clinical, nutritional and psychological signals should trigger a REDs assessment—and who should coordinate care?

Physician · Dietitian · Psychologist · S&C · AthleteOpen primary source · 2023 IOC REDs consensus · PubMed
Governance case 06

A disclosure crosses medical, legal and federation systems

How should immediate safety, reporting, confidentiality, due process and survivor-centred support be coordinated?

Safeguarding · Law · Medicine · Psychology · GovernanceOpen primary source · IOC harassment and abuse consensus

Discussion principles

Discuss cases without identifying athletes.

  1. 01Verified member identity and role
  2. 02No personal health data or identifiable case details
  3. 03Named sources and clear conflict-of-interest disclosure
  4. 04Clinical and safeguarding moderation with an escalation route