Back to nutrition and supplements

Research summary · Nutrition and supplements

Caffeine showed a pooled swimming benefit, but evidence certainty remained low

This review included thirteen randomized crossover studies involving 144 men and 48 women. A three-level model accounted for multiple performance measurements within studies rather than treating all 28 effect sizes as independent experiments.

Publication year
2026
First published online
Publication type
Systematic review and three-level meta-analysis of placebo-controlled crossover trials
Journal
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Population / context
Swimming · Competitive swimmers · Women and men

What the publication reports

The pooled performance effect favoured caffeine (standardized mean difference 0.57, 95% CI 0.20–0.94). An alternative analysis translated this to about a 1.7% improvement. Effects varied substantially between studies. Exploratory subgroup results suggested a larger effect at higher doses, but they do not establish the best dose for an individual swimmer.

Limits and interpretation

The authors rated certainty low, and every included trial had some risk-of-bias concerns. There were relatively few women, small studies and varied swimming protocols. Subgroup patterns are hypothesis-generating; the review does not justify escalating caffeine intake or ignoring sleep, anxiety and other adverse effects. A pooled laboratory benefit is not a guaranteed race improvement.

Original editorial summary by iintroo editorial · Added · Source-checked .

This is an educational research summary, not a reproduced abstract, a new scientific study or an individual treatment plan.

Reader discussion

Discuss the evidence.

Moderated comments

Ask a question, share a source or discuss the methods. Respectful disagreement is welcome. Every comment and reply is reviewed before publication.

No profanity, harassment, hate, threats, spam or identifiable patient details. Discussion rules and privacy

Loading comments…